Jump to content

Naecken

Member
  • Posts

    1,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Naecken

  1. I'm thinking The opposite since I think we protect them by giving them more options. And like I said if people don't even try to come up with a game K don't thin they deserve The points. I can play Tuesday. I can't, can you do Fridaay? No! Let's call it a draw does not deserve points in My book and The fact that people decide to draw even though it's not possible. I don't demand that The admins check every game ( even thougj that would give them less time to run stuff like The Dirty Git Competition) but giving them The option to admin a game in more then two Ways when they think it's appropriate.
  2. Not sure you can use BB-fluff as an excuse to justify unsportsmanlike behaviour though :P
  3. So hacking you opponents computer Making sure he can't show up is perfectly fine in The spirit of The Evil Gits too? Can't remember The name of that Skaventeam that poisoned their opponents tal win BB??? But it doesn't seem that different to me
  4. I Know but I think we should have. At least Pidpad agrees which says something given oh rarely that happens :-P
  5. I'm just saying it's too easy for The players to decide on a draw. Sometimes it's obviously correkt but there are times when a loss for both teams would be more accurate and I think it would be nice if The admins at least had that option. I can give one example where me and My opponent decided on a time. I then asked in The forums if we could start an hout later but received no answer before I had to go to bed so I showed up but My opponent instead replied that he couldn't move The game but was happy with a draw or even a loss on his part since he was on holiday with The family. The game was admins as a draw and while I do respect The decisison My personal oppinion is that ge did not really deserve a draw. Problem is that I don't think I deserved a free win either so The most appropriate would have been to give me 1 point and My opponent 0 points but that option isn't available and neither is 0 points to both teams which is a bit unfortunate.
  6. Well I remember that back in The fumbbl era you would get suspended if you set games up. So if two people would just start a game and let it go to time there would be ni CAS no TD etcetera which is not at all in The spirit if BB and could easily be fixed to not be within The rules of OCC. And I don't think that people do exploit it but i do think it's tio easy to just "decide" on a draw and leaving The admins no other option. I've played games at 4am in The morning before going to work and if people are in different timezones and none of then can Do that sacrifice I don't think they deserve a draw. Neither do I think they deserve a draw if they can only play one day of The week and that happens to be different days. Being available for 1/7 days is bot good enough in My book so then both should get a loss.
  7. Depends on The player too. Some people take more risks = more luck involved. I have lost plenty of games in The last year that I would have won two-three years ago since I play less BB nowdays and are notably worse then I was back in The day.
  8. I'm running My matches using My phone atm. I use no extra stuff and had no problems so far other then The a somewhat slow connection one of The matches but The amount of data as not a problem.
  9. I Know hat you can't agree on a result but it happens quite often. And The Asterix was to try and solve The you can't give both teams a loss problem. Let's say (and I don't say this would happen but let's say it did) Jim and Bob are in 1st and 2nd in div 2A after match 8. They both have 19 points and a TD difference +8 and +6. They play against eachother in MD9. In 3rd place we have Charlie on 17 points and +2. Now a draw seems pretty nice for both Jim and Bob. Charlie wins his match 3-1 so The Table ends: Jim 20p +8 Bob 20p +6 Charlie 20p +4 Jim and Bob gets a promotion to div1. If it instead ended as following: Charlie 20p +4 *Jim 20p +8 *Bob 20p +6 I'm sure it would at least give Bob a reason to try a bit harder to find some time to play The game instead of taking The easy draw. Now I hope that intentional draws don't take place in this League but if they do a * would prevent that from ever happening and possibly lower The Numbers of unintentional draws as well if people were given more of a reason to make The game happen. Not saying people should always get a * but at least it could be a nice options for The admins to have.
  10. Was thinking about this since a situation came up for me in div2. Basically me and opponent could have a game happening if we really tried but The current situation with holiday and time issues make it so that it is tempting to leave it in The hands of The admins to decide. For me this kind of thinking is really flawed and I think both coaches should try as hard as possible to just play The game. So I sugest that if The admins feel like this is not The case: they should have The option to give both teams a loss. I don't know if this is possible though. Probably not so at least give both teams a * which is then The first tiebreaker for teams that end up on The same points. = Teams with a * are ranked behind teams teams without a *. Teams with ** even lower and when we get to *** further actions might be necessary like Being automaticly relegated or asked to consider if they should really play in The League. Too often I see people "decide" on an admins draw and sometimes it might be valid reasons to do so even though players can't really decide to take The draw so that kind of thinking is flawed to begin with. I'm sure people would be less tempted to decide on an admined double loss so would maybe less games being decided by admins. Giving both teams a * is basically still quite close and I could even see times where an admined loss deserves The addition of a * to the teams stats to encourage people to play The games that they agreed on when they signed up for The League in The first place.
  11. Greve through?! What a fecking joke..........
  12. Ghana was The better team agains USA but USA also took an early lead so it's hard to tell what The game would have looked like otherwise. I think Ghana have The skills to beat any team though and not sure that is true for USA. The interesting thing about this tournament is that no team have really been flawless so far except Maybe France and I question The level of their oppositions so right now there are a bunch of teams that could Potentielly win The thing.
  13. Honduras competent? The only reason they looked good against Equador is that Equador is equally bad. To me that group is The weakest of The whole tournament. I'd rank them as follow from what I've seen. G and B Being The two strongest groups where more then one team have been truly impressive. D for having at least one really good team and nu push overs. C and E since one team is good and A for having 3 fine teams. F and H where no team has really impressed me. I was tempted to put group A in The bottom too but couldn't do it since one solid team will come in third. I really can't see any of The teams from that group advancing past Holland/Chile though so out in The second round. So I guess France's group didn't come dead last but that's only because of them. The other three formning the weakest trio in any group.
  14. Germany is a much better team then Portugal. It really is as simple as that.
  15. So tonight it's time for My Dark horse to enter The tournament. Belgium! Not sure they count though since badically everyone have them as their Dark Horse. This might be too soon for them but I expect great things to come from them in Euro2016 and The next WC. Still at least QF this tournament and wouldn't be suprised to see them do even better.
  16. Was one of those games that could have gone either way.
  17. He signed for another year in Juve.
  18. Diouf was too much. He was a scumbag not only as a footballer but as a human being. As for The WC. I don't see Brazil winning it. Keeper is not good enough and The forwards are not good enough. Fred really? Nice dive but that's all he did.
  19. And there we have The first One in this WC. Fred complete garbage The whole game but at least he knew how to dive. Good for him!
  20. That's The first 45 minutes! Let's hope that The rest of The tournament Will be just as good!
  21. None as redicoulus as this one regarding our "friend" Hristo...."you couldn't do anything but like him." :P
  22. You Know that I like you Bonis (Pidpad) but from time to time you do come up with strange opinions that makes no sense!
  23. There are plenty of Dutch Players that are hard to like. Berkamp, Van Nistelroy, Robben. How ever The most unlikable player ever got to be Risto Stoijtkov. The Guy had no respect for anyone but himself. In 94 when we beat them in the match for. Third place what made me almost as happy was that he failed to score The goal that would let him overtake Oleg Salenko for most goals in The tournament despite Salenko only playing three games in The tournament, scoring five goals in one game against Cameron.
  24. Amazing memory when consider The fact that Italy played against West Germany in The finals 1982 :P
×
×
  • Create New...